Skip to main content
PrismCDM

One operating model regardless of how the study is funded.

Built For VPs of Research, Chief Research Officers, Institutional QA and Regulatory, Department Chairs, Cooperative-group leaders

Academic medical centers run investigator-initiated, industry-sponsored, NIH-funded, cooperative-group, and foundation-funded studies on infrastructure that varies department by department. PrismCDM is the regulated operating substrate that unifies Trial Intelligence, execution, evidence, and submission readiness across the institution while respecting the structural realities of AMC governance.

The AMC operating problem.

Academic medical centers coordinate clinical research across departments, IRBs, cooperative groups, and industry sponsors, on infrastructure that was never designed to give the institution a single regulated view.

  • Investigator-initiated and industry-sponsored trials are run on different infrastructure with different operational expectations.
  • IRB cycles, departmental approvals, and institutional reviews are coordinated through disconnected institutional processes.
  • Institutional leadership lacks a consistent view of research quality, operational readiness, and regulatory posture across the organization.
  • Evidence of compliance is reconstructed at audit time across departments that did not coordinate during execution.
  • Faculty want to use AI on their protocols without introducing institutional inspection risk.

One substrate. Many departments. Institutional scoping by design.

PrismCDM is the regulated operating substrate the institution operates on; departments, PIs, and cooperative-group affiliations are tenant-scoped consumers of that substrate. The institution gets a single inspectable view without flattening departmental governance.

One substrate across the institution

One operating model regardless of how the study is funded. Investigator-initiated, industry-sponsored, NIH-funded, cooperative-group, foundation-funded, all on the same regulated substrate with departmental and IRB scoping enforced at the data layer.

Faculty-friendly

Faculty investigators receive immediate operational guidance without waiting for centralized review, while institutional operations works from the same underlying intelligence.

Institutionally inspectable

Every value carries an evidence classification, every artifact carries integrity anchors. Institutional QA, regulatory, and audit teams can independently verify the operational record across departments.

Institutional governance by design

Tenant scoping supports the actual structure of an AMC: multiple PIs, multiple IRBs, multiple departmental owners, multiple cooperative-group affiliations, all on the same substrate.

Inspection ready every day

The Inspection Evidence Package is generated on demand for any study, any department, any auditor. Continuous accumulation replaces audit-time reconstruction.

Works with cooperative groups and sponsors

PrismCDM operates alongside cooperative-group infrastructure, sponsor stacks, and the EDCs already required by industry contracts. No rip-and-replace of established workflows.

Investigator-initiated research. Same rigor.

Academic medical centers compete for grants, train the next generation of investigators, and run studies that industry cannot. PrismCDM applies the same regulated operating substrate to the protocols faculty author themselves.

Investigator-initiated research

Generate Trial Intelligence for internally authored protocols with the same rigor applied to industry-sponsored studies. Faculty bring their protocol; PrismCDM brings the operating substrate.

Research enablement

Help investigators move from protocol development to study execution with consistent operational support across the institution. The substrate that runs a Phase 3 sponsor study also runs the investigator-initiated pilot.

From PI to institutional research dashboard.

Departments, PIs, and individual studies roll up into one institutional research view, without flattening departmental governance.

  1. Institution
  2. College of Medicine
  3. Department
  4. Principal Investigator
  5. Study
  6. PrismCDM
  7. Institutional Research Dashboard

Outcomes an institutional research leadership team can measure.

  • One regulated substrate across investigator-initiated, industry-sponsored, NIH-funded, cooperative-group, and foundation-funded studies.
  • Trial Intelligence on every protocol, including investigator-initiated protocols faculty author themselves.
  • Standardize research operations across departments without changing departmental governance.
  • Support investigator-initiated research with the same operational discipline as sponsored clinical trials.
  • Continuous evidence accumulation across all departments running clinical research.
  • Institutional QA and regulatory teams able to inspect across the full clinical research portfolio.
  • A regulated home for AI that does not introduce institutional liability.
  • Faster IRB and departmental cycles because the substrate is the same across the institution.

What institutional research leadership remembers after the room clears.

Three reasons academic medical centers adopt PrismCDM. The reasons their leadership teams remember after the room clears.

Institutional governance

One consistent view of research quality, operational readiness, and regulatory posture across departments, IRBs, and PIs.

Research enablement

Faculty bring the protocol; PrismCDM brings the operating substrate. Investigator-initiated research operates with the same discipline as sponsored trials.

One model regardless of funding

Industry-sponsored, NIH-funded, cooperative-group, foundation-funded. The operating model is the same; the governance is preserved.

Start with your protocol

See PrismCDM on one of your investigator-initiated or sponsored protocols.

Generate a free Executive Summary on a public ClinicalTrials.gov study, or walk an investigator-initiated or industry-sponsored protocol with our team under NDA.